Understanding Apex Execution Context

Governor Limits

Apex operates in a multi-tenant environment, enforcing strict limits to protect platform stability. These include:

  • CPU time (e.g., 10,000 ms per transaction)
  • SOQL queries (max 100 synchronous)
  • DML operations (max 150 synchronous)

These thresholds can silently terminate logic or result in unpredictable behavior if not monitored correctly.

Common Transactional Patterns

Key Apex constructs include:

  • Triggers
  • Batch Apex
  • Queueable and Future methods
  • Scheduled Jobs

Each has unique execution semantics and error handling characteristics. Misusing them leads to systemic failures at scale.

Diagnosing Complex Apex Issues

1. CPU Time Limit Exceeded

Occurs during large loops or chained DML/logic executions.

// Avoid nested loops
for(Account a : [SELECT Id FROM Account LIMIT 100]) {
  for(Contact c : [SELECT Id FROM Contact WHERE AccountId = :a.Id]) {
    // BAD: Nested SOQL inside loop
  }
}

Fix: Use Map collections and bulkified patterns to pre-fetch data outside loops.

2. Mixed DML Operation Error

Thrown when trying to modify setup and non-setup objects in a single transaction (e.g., User and Contact).

// BAD: Mixed DML
update newUser;
insert newContact;

Fix: Use System.runAs in test context or defer using @future method.

3. Uncommitted Work Pending

This error appears when callouts occur after DML in the same context.

// BAD: DML before HTTP callout
insert newAccount;
HttpResponse res = new Http().send(req);

Fix: Move callouts to @future(callout=true) or Queueable context.

Architectural Implications

Limits as Design Constraints

System limits aren't bugs—they're guardrails. Code must be architected to scale within those bounds, which necessitates patterns like:

  • Bulkification of logic
  • Defensive programming with limits checks
  • Retry logic using Platform Events or Custom Metadata

Statelessness of Triggers and Apex Classes

Trigger order is not guaranteed, and class variables reset per transaction. Don't rely on persistent or static memory unless scoped per transaction using Limits.get* or Trigger.is* flags.

Step-by-Step Troubleshooting Workflow

Step 1: Use Developer Console Logs

// Check logs for execution limits
Debug Only: true
Start time, SOQL counts, heap size, DML operations

Step 2: Isolate Logic by Context

Break large trigger logic into handler classes per operation (beforeInsert, afterUpdate). Separate async from sync logic.

Step 3: Log Limits Consumption

System.debug('CPU Time: ' + Limits.getCpuTime());
System.debug('Heap Size: ' + Limits.getHeapSize());

This reveals which segment consumes the most resources.

Step 4: Add Custom Error Flags

if(Limits.getDmlStatements() > 140) {
  throw new CustomException('Approaching DML limit');
}

Step 5: Use Checkpoints

Set breakpoints in Developer Console to snapshot object state mid-execution. This helps catch mutation errors or data shape mismatches.

Best Practices

  • Always bulkify triggers—never assume single-record context
  • Leverage custom settings or metadata to drive config behavior
  • Isolate DML from logic flow using helper classes
  • Use Queueable instead of Future where chaining is required
  • Audit limits using Platform Events and Monitor Logs

Conclusion

Apex isn't just another object-oriented language—it's a controlled execution environment that demands design discipline. Senior engineers must navigate its runtime rules, asynchronous quirks, and transactional boundaries with architectural foresight. By structuring code for scale and using Salesforce-native tools to monitor execution, many of the "random" failures become traceable patterns with definitive fixes. Enterprises relying on Apex must view troubleshooting as an opportunity to harden application resilience, not just resolve errors.

FAQs

1. Why does my Apex trigger fail only in bulk operations?

Triggers written for single-record assumptions (e.g., direct SOQL inside loops) will fail under bulk inserts. Always design for bulk use cases.

2. Can Queueable Apex avoid governor limits?

No, Queueable jobs still obey limits, but they get their own execution context, allowing partitioned work.

3. What causes SOQL limits to be hit unexpectedly?

Recursive triggers or improperly scoped queries inside loops quickly consume the 100-query threshold. Refactor into maps and static flags.

4. Is it safe to chain multiple Queueables?

Yes, but only one level of chaining is allowed natively. For more, use a stateful pattern or custom job scheduler.

5. How can I debug logic across multiple async contexts?

Use correlation IDs and log entries to trace execution. Combine this with Platform Events for full pipeline observability.