Troubleshooting Memory Bloat and Performance Issues in Large-Scale Ruby Applications

Details: Category: Programming Languages; By Mindful Chase; 13.Aug; Hits: 5

Ruby is a versatile, developer-friendly language that powers everything from small scripts to enterprise-scale platforms like Shopify and GitHub. However, in large-scale deployments, subtle issues can emerge that rarely show up in smaller projects. One particularly complex and under-discussed problem is memory bloat and performance degradation in long-running Ruby processes under heavy load. These issues often go unnoticed until production performance degrades, infrastructure costs rise, or the application crashes unexpectedly. For architects and senior engineers, diagnosing and fixing these problems requires a deep understanding of Ruby’s memory model, garbage collection (GC) behavior, and the way large applications manage object lifecycles.

Mindful Chase

Writing Code, Writing Stories

tbd

Experience

tbd

More to Explore

Understanding the Problem

Background

Ruby uses a garbage collector to manage memory, but in large-scale web or background processing environments—especially with frameworks like Rails—object churn and long-lived references can cause heap growth over time. In multi-threaded or forked server setups (e.g., Puma, Unicorn), certain patterns exacerbate memory retention, including large in-memory caches, ORM object graphs, and accidental global references.

Architectural Context

In enterprise environments, Ruby often runs as a persistent process in an application server or job processor (Sidekiq, Resque). Over time, each request or job can create thousands of temporary objects. Without careful lifecycle management, these objects accumulate, stressing both memory and GC cycles. This can result in:

Increased GC frequency and latency
Process RSS growth without release (especially in MRI due to memory fragmentation)
Infrastructure scaling to handle degraded performance rather than fixing root causes

Diagnostics and Root Cause Analysis

Reproducing the Issue

Run a high-throughput load test against the Ruby application while monitoring memory usage with ps, top, or GC profiling tools.

# Example using GC::Profiler
GC::Profiler.enable
# ... run workload ...
puts GC::Profiler.report

Identifying Memory Bloat

Use tools like memory_profiler, derailed_benchmarks, or heap-profiler to identify retained objects and their origins.

require 'memory_profiler'
report = MemoryProfiler.report do
  # Code under test
end
report.pretty_print

Common Patterns Leading to Bloat

Global or class-level caches without eviction
ActiveRecord query results held in long-lived variables
Large JSON/XML parsing without streaming
Background jobs loading more data than needed

Common Pitfalls

Ignoring GC Tuning

Default GC settings may not be optimal for large heaps. Without tuning, GC pauses can increase and throughput can drop under load.

Misusing Caches

Unbounded in-memory caches (e.g., Rails.cache with MemoryStore in production) can lead to unbounded growth and memory exhaustion.

Not Accounting for Forking Behavior

In pre-fork servers, large objects loaded before forking can be duplicated in memory if modified, increasing RSS dramatically.

Step-by-Step Fixes

1. Profile Memory Usage

Establish a baseline with memory_profiler or derailed_benchmarks and identify the largest contributors to retained memory.

2. Implement Cache Eviction Policies

Rails.cache.write("key", value, expires_in: 5.minutes)

Always use TTLs or LRU policies in production caches.

3. Optimize ActiveRecord Usage

# Avoid loading all records into memory
User.where(active: true).find_each(batch_size: 1000) do |user|
  process(user)
end

4. Adjust GC Settings

Tune Ruby’s GC for your workload using environment variables:

RUBY_GC_HEAP_GROWTH_FACTOR=1.1 RUBY_GC_MALLOC_LIMIT=90000000 RUBY_GC_OLDMALLOC_LIMIT=90000000

5. Use Object Pools for Reusable Structures

For frequently allocated large structures, consider reusing them to reduce GC churn.

Best Practices

Integrate memory profiling into CI for large features
Use jemalloc in production for better memory fragmentation handling
Limit memory per process and use process recycling (e.g., puma_worker_killer)
Prefer streaming APIs for large data loads
Educate teams on memory-safe coding patterns

Conclusion

Memory bloat in Ruby enterprise systems is often the result of cumulative small inefficiencies that manifest under sustained load. By profiling memory, tuning GC, managing caches responsibly, and optimizing ORM usage, teams can maintain predictable performance and avoid costly infrastructure scaling driven by inefficiencies rather than demand.

FAQs

1. Why doesn’t Ruby release memory back to the OS?

Ruby’s memory allocator may retain memory for reuse within the process, especially in MRI, due to fragmentation and performance considerations.

2. Can switching to JRuby solve memory issues?

JRuby uses the JVM’s garbage collector, which can behave differently and may reduce fragmentation, but underlying code patterns still need optimization.

3. Is jemalloc worth using in production?

Yes, jemalloc often reduces fragmentation and improves RSS stability, especially for memory-intensive Rails apps.

4. How often should I profile memory in production?

Regularly during high-load events or after major feature deployments; integrate lightweight monitoring to detect growth trends.

5. Does multi-threading in Ruby increase memory pressure?

It can, especially if threads share large data structures or increase object churn; careful synchronization and object lifecycle management are required.

Contact Us