Troubleshooting Stack Corruption in Assembly Language Programs

Details: Category: Programming Languages; By Mindful Chase; 27.Jul; Hits: 7

Assembly language programming, while offering fine-grained control over hardware, introduces a class of subtle, hard-to-diagnose bugs that high-level developers rarely encounter. One such issue is stack corruption—especially in large-scale or cross-platform assembly routines that interface with C libraries or operating system kernels. Stack corruption can cause intermittent segmentation faults, incorrect return values, or unpredictable behavior that is nearly impossible to reproduce consistently. In enterprise-grade embedded systems, firmware, or performance-critical components, these faults can lead to catastrophic failures. This article explores stack corruption in Assembly, examining root causes, architectural implications, and robust solutions, targeting senior systems engineers and compiler-level developers.

Mindful Chase

Writing Code, Writing Stories

tbd

Experience

tbd

More to Explore

Understanding Stack Corruption in Assembly

What Is Stack Corruption?

Stack corruption occurs when memory within the call stack is unintentionally overwritten. This could be due to incorrect use of the stack pointer (SP), improper preservation of registers, or misaligned data structures. The result is typically seen during function return, parameter access, or when restoring saved state.

Common Scenarios

Failing to preserve callee-saved registers as per ABI conventions
Using incorrect stack alignment on platforms requiring 16-byte alignment (e.g., x86-64)
Overrunning local variable space
Mismatched call/ret instructions in manually written call chains

Architectural Impact and ABI Violations

Calling Conventions and Register Discipline

Every platform has a standard calling convention—such as the System V AMD64 ABI or Microsoft x64—which specifies how arguments are passed and which registers must be preserved. Violating these rules causes downstream routines to behave unpredictably.

push rbp
mov rbp, rsp
sub rsp, 32         ; allocate local stack frame
mov [rbp-8], rdi     ; store argument
...
leave                ; equivalent to mov rsp, rbp + pop rbp
ret

Stack Alignment Requirements

Modern processors like x86-64 require 16-byte alignment for optimal performance and for certain SIMD instructions (e.g., SSE/AVX). Misalignment leads to crashes or SIGSEGVs on some platforms.

; Correct alignment before call
and rsp, -16
call some_function

Diagnosis Techniques

Stack Tracing and Debugging Tools

Use tools like GDB, Valgrind (with --track-origins=yes), or Intel's Pin for runtime analysis. Pay close attention to the stack pointer before and after each function call.

Audit with Static Analysis

Perform manual inspection or use tools like objdump or radare2 to verify push/pop symmetry, stack alignment, and callee preservation.

objdump -d -Mintel binary.o | grep -A10 func_name

Step-by-Step Fix for Stack Corruption

1. Respect Calling Conventions

Ensure you save and restore all callee-saved registers (e.g., rbx, rbp, r12–r15 on x86-64 System V).

push rbx
push rbp
mov rbp, rsp
...
pop rbp
pop rbx
ret

2. Maintain Stack Alignment

Always adjust stack frames to preserve 16-byte alignment before making calls that expect it.

sub rsp, 8   ; ensure rsp % 16 == 0 before call
call foo
add rsp, 8

3. Use Red Zones Correctly

On System V, the 128-byte red zone below RSP can be used in leaf functions. Don't overwrite it in interrupt handlers or non-leaf calls.

; Red zone example (only valid in leaf functions)
mov rax, [rsp-8] ; safe read
mov [rsp-16], rbx ; safe write

Best Practices for Assembly Safety

Document stack layout per function, including arguments, local vars, and return addresses
Use macros or inline assembly wrappers to avoid manual errors
Automate ABI compliance checks as part of build steps using binutils or Capstone
In mixed C/ASM projects, isolate Assembly behind stable C function boundaries

Conclusion

Stack corruption in Assembly programs is one of the most elusive and dangerous classes of bugs, capable of destabilizing entire applications or operating systems. By strictly adhering to ABI rules, maintaining proper stack discipline, and using modern analysis tools, senior developers and system architects can mitigate these risks. Assembly is powerful, but with that power comes the responsibility to respect the low-level mechanics of the runtime environment. Failures in this domain are rarely forgiving, but always preventable.

FAQs

1. What's the difference between caller- and callee-saved registers?

Caller-saved registers must be preserved by the caller if needed; callee-saved must be restored by the callee. Violating this breaks the call chain.

2. How can I detect misaligned stack usage?

Use GDB to inspect the stack pointer (RSP) before function calls. Check if RSP is 16-byte aligned using info registers.

3. Can stack corruption occur in inline Assembly?

Yes. Inline Assembly within C can corrupt the stack if constraints are misused or alignment is not preserved, especially around variadic functions.

4. What happens if I forget to restore a callee-saved register?

The calling function may behave unpredictably, leading to logic errors or segmentation faults due to register state inconsistencies.

5. Are stack alignment requirements consistent across platforms?

No. For example, x86-64 mandates 16-byte alignment, while ARM may have different constraints. Always refer to the platform ABI documentation.

Contact Us